If a resident of any residential neighborhood talks about cleanliness, avoiding making mistakes on the road, dealing well with people, not taking bad faith and many other beautiful values, then it is assumed and logical that this speaker should be an example before that. But if he says that and repeats it all the time just because he lives in a large house, has some influence here and there, his palace is dirty, and he allows fleeing criminals to stay inside the yard and he does not apply those values to himself, then the rest of the neighborhood residents will have hesitation and doubts about the goals of this speaker. Not only that, but he himself has begun to adopt values that are inconsistent with human instinct, and then begins to accuse the residents of the neighborhood, who are multi-religious and ethnic, of injustice and the abuse of "rights", and tries to impede the access of services to them.
This is what the United States adopts around the world, sets standards for it, and then prints annual reports that classify countries in terms of their adherence to those “rights.”
I didn't come up with anything new, I was there a year ago, and I was horrified by what I saw of the security chaos, evidenced by the high crime rates and the use of the main roads as homes for homeless addicts and mentally ill people. (America is the first economy in the world). “Democratically,” half of Americans still believe that Biden’s victory in the presidency is similar to the victory of any president from a third world country. The whole world learned about the lie of Russian interference in the elections that President Trump won, as it turned out that the story was fabricated by Hillary Clinton, who later agreed with the prosecution to pay a sum of money in exchange for turning the page. How much did that lie cost the American taxpayer in investigative research and reports that were followed by a concerted campaign to impeach the US President during his term in office? The irony is that today they are prosecuting the former president for a case that is much more trivial than the Clinton case.. Long live justice.
The American model that has been revealed to us in the past few years, including the military destruction of Iraq and Libya, and the death of hundreds of thousands of innocent people, does not qualify it to judge others and assess their justice or their dealings with minorities. As for the gay story, it is the straw that breaks the back. Unashamedly professing their rights has become the backbone of that great country's policy. They speak as if the countries of the world opposing these insane exaggerations and lack of modesty and taste are killing and burying homosexuals. This, of course, is not true, as homosexuality has existed since before the emergence of some prophets, and we have not heard that there is a homosexual who has been held accountable for his behavior, which he did not choose in the first place. In Islamic countries, they enjoy equal opportunities for work, security and a decent life. Of course, this is not enough for the new America. America today wants to openly reveal homosexuality and encourage its proliferation by pushing children to change their gender, and enacting laws that prevent parents from interfering in teaching their children how to achieve the transition to the opposite sex in which the boy or girl was born. All of this, with its disgust, is done through public education supported by the federal judiciary and their supreme courts.. Imagine.
This is the tip of the iceberg, as what is happening in that country is madness that exceeds the expectations of most pessimists. They open their borders to receive millions from Central American countries, including, of course, drug dealers and promoters. Crime levels are rising and shops are being looted without any prosecutions. Is there a sovereign country that wishes "American democracy" to bring such scenes to it? Rather, where are the rights of the majority of the American people that pay the price. The taxpayer there now spends his money on drug addiction treatment and combating crimes, most of which are caused by new immigrants, instead of developing infrastructure, security and health care.
They call for freedom of opinion with fabricated and blatant ignorance that puts high treason in return for the price. Just freedom of opinion, and no government has the right to hold the traitors accountable among its own children. I don't think any sane country would accept all this nonsense to please the US State Department so that its name would be removed from that list.
Which is supposed to be adopted by America or any other country that agrees with the idea of categorizing others, and instead of repeating the exhausted “rights” term, reforming its internal conditions and rearranging its priorities again to become an attractive model for others. After that, he urged countries less fortunate in education to develop its system and curricula in a way that stimulates innovations, and the Americans are among the pioneers in that. It should embrace women's rights and urge developing countries to give women equal opportunities in education, work and personal rights. It should help poor countries in health care to build their systems and protect their societies from epidemics. And with the extent of the United States' experience in agriculture, what prevents it from contributing with international participation in land reclamation and crop cultivation in some countries and marketing it? To set such standards first and then classify the countries of the world in this way, if the classification is one of her favorite hobbies. We have to realize that there is no justice with poverty, and that economic development is the ultimate goal. Here, America will become a real pioneer in building people in the world and the first motive for sponsoring creators, especially in poor countries that are in dire need of these initiatives. Here we can believe the saying of “human rights” and stand with its annual statements that expose the corruption of the governments of some developing countries and their refusal to adopt such great initiatives for the benefit of their people.
Fahd Ibrahim Al-Deghaither