I love Sheikh Saleh Al-Maghamisi as a preacher (which is a higher degree than a scholar), he tried and tries to work on expanding his jurisprudential vision, and he has a path that is endearing to people and loving them. Because he entered from the door of hope, every Muslim has many hopes in his mind, and if there is a note, it can be said that the hope of Sheikh Saleh remained confined to a narrow corner, because the fifth school that he hopes to establish at his hands will not add anything, as he is the scholar who knows that the Sunni and other schools are numerous It did not differentiate much, and it did not solve the new issues, and if we wanted to enumerate the schools of thought, we would find that they exceeded fifty schools of thought, most of them became extinct for many reasons, just as the hope of Sheikh Al-Maghamsi to establish a fifth Sunni school was not accompanied by a desire to collect the different schools of thought in a school that would contain, so that it would gather what was not It is gathered by discordant sects in order to rid the nation of strife and sectarian differences, but its hope remains within the circle of (Ahl al-Sunnah wal Jama`ah), and for this reason its fifth sect will be nothing but re-pouring water into water (the base of the fountain).
And I hoped that his hope would be comprehensive, so that it would bring together the sects and sects of Muslims in one doctrine, or rather that the new doctrine would contain what was previously mentioned, or that it would be a doctrine that nullifies the sectarianism in the first place, taking from the rule (Say, “I believe in God, then be steadfast”) as a unified guiding light, so that Islam returns to what it was Without remembering sectarianism, as was the era of the Messenger, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, and his rightly guided caliphs.
And I believe that any rejuvenating doctrine of the Islamic nation requires it to be a doctrine with a broad outlook, so that the nation can live in the future without the rule of the apostate or the abrogated, or the abrogated, or the imposition of the jihad of demand, or or or…, and that the new doctrine dares to stand against Hadiths with a text that does not conform to the Book of God or that contradicts reason and science alike, and that the new doctrine also has foundations that are commensurate with the dynamics of life, so that the start of renewal is an examining, searching, correcting or nullifying of everything that is not right with the verses of God, and the review is accurate For the beginning of the era of codifying hadiths and biography, and the emergence and continuity of the four schools of thought with or against what they said, that is, there would be a review of everything that was said from 1200, as a period of time that recorded and wrote down many things (hadiths and biography) that were written 200 years after the death of the Messenger, may God bless him and grant him peace.
This is a premature observation of what any new doctrine can do.
Returning to the hope of Sheikh Salih, what he hopes for necessitates delving into the various sciences, and bringing what the early scholars did not bring in terms of rulings and deductions that are consistent with the rule (Islam is good for every place and time). The progress of time, as it was unable to what we are in of social and scientific developments, the analogy that Imam Al-Shafi’i developed and made it a source of Islam was not able to measure adequately or completely, there are issues that expanded, and others developed, just as the fourth source is from the sources of Islam developed by Imam Al-Shafi’i ( The consensus of the scholars of the nation) This condition can be violated, as there is no longer a consensus of the scholars of the nation due to the different schools of thought, as well as the emergence of new opinions… In addition, the issue of closing the door to ijtihad was opened through recent opinions that considered that closing the door to ijtihad brought doctrinal disasters since the time of closing the door to ijtihad. The new school accepts these views with the fundamental differences between them and the jurisprudential legacy and the biography legacy, as two main examples?
On the other hand, our beloved Sheikh Al-Maghamsi knows that the people of the schools of thought (the fifty), none of them claimed that he would establish a school of thought, as it is customary for the scholar to say his opinions and study them at the time of his presence alive, and in the following times his opinions become correct among groups of people So those opinions become followed, and some people imitate them, and this is how the doctrine is established, and none of them said that I brought a new doctrine, or thought during his life that he would bring a new doctrine.
As for me, I see that there are jurisprudential opinions that were said at the present time, and through the people who believed in those opinions and innovative ideas, the ideas of their owners and their deductions will become doctrines called by their owners. With the passage of time, and so that it is comprehensive in its view of the most correct, and this means that the huge scientific institution will be able to redeem the hadiths from their weak and unique ones, and purify the biography from the lies that have been attached to it.
I am almost certain to say: The new doctrine will not emerge from a single person, no matter how much knowledge he is given. Rather, the coming doctrine will be represented in a scientific institution that brings together dozens of scholars in all fields of knowledge. The product of this institution will be a new doctrine in which accuracy and authenticity have been investigated in and from everything. .
Abdou Khal