cialix people decided the pbteen method is good because of plenitude and mapping could be abnormal even in the absence of scar so that’s one of the main values of T when mapping the question now is how can we accurately measure t1 mapping and so I don’t need much information about the team in MapInfo rejection but potentially that could be useful for that Kotaku up save this potential bit again because of that we will out the receive example dilated cardiomyopathy and hypertrophic are not be a very similar signals so I don’t know if rejection for example and proven piece of rejection whether the t1 maps would be similar to other diseases in which case it will be difficult to determine whether or not it’s due the rejection as opposed to someone who happens had Michael Davis and the heart transplant there
cialix pills both this would be the better sequence to acquire because it only takes 8 seconds of a bell to standard deviations so that’s why we challenge that we have malware that’s even mapping now that I just so micro fewer percent of cases that will look like Michael and they could still have – and that’s when this is what is an ongoing clinical trial there is an ongoing prospective study looking at t1 mapping [Music] so most of the patients actually do not have follow-up so it shows you a few cases where some of the persons will follow-up had the same amount of scar some patients had less scar in a scale at all those are really the more negative cases most of the patients we’ve encountered I should do not get a my follow-up once the my occurred as good as I will so not diagnosed they do not come back for a subsequent exam usually when patients come in for all kind of America data saw a validation bigger than all the sequences