What ETF Flows Actually Tell You About Crypto Demand
Fund inflows get quoted as proof of institutional appetite. The number is real; the interpretation is usually wrong.
Every coffee keeps the site running. Thank you!
Tech, gaming and the news that matters
432 posts
Fund inflows get quoted as proof of institutional appetite. The number is real; the interpretation is usually wrong.
After a summer spent in the low sixties, bitcoin cleared eighty thousand in late August. The reasons are mostly not about crypto.
The block reward halves every four years. What happens to network security when it approaches zero is an open question.
After several cycles of collapse, a small set of applications kept working. They are not the ones that got the attention.
The threat is real, specific, and slower than the headlines suggest. Here is which part actually breaks.
The energy question was answered decisively. The centralisation question was not.
The original use case was buying things. Almost nobody does, and the reasons are structural rather than temporary.
Putting bonds and funds on a blockchain sounds like a solution looking for a problem. In settlement, it is not.
Dozens of countries are developing them. The design decisions matter far more than the technology.
Neither replacing the financial system nor disappearing. Something narrower and more boring than either prediction.