The philosophical literature that contains explanations and readings concerned with the relationship of language to thought and logic concludes by saying its inevitability, and attributes its great importance and continuous ability to polarize light to its close connection with human thinking, as is its emergence as a focus of research and a subject of philosophical controversy that expanded analysis and interpretation to form the two streams of “logical analysis of language” and “ The Philosophy of Difference», which gave philosophy the richest theories and what derives from them in the interpretation of linguistic symbols and their relationship to the world, not only as a complex system of signs that require an investigation of its impact and method of work, but also as an opening to consciousness, a tool for detection, and an entrance to renew the view towards philosophy itself, which created a broad consistency in which questions are created. Expansive in its dexterity and accurate in its outcome, it was hardly presented until the sharp answers poured in towards it, those that I do not think are among them or among those who took the nature of language and gave its truth a great deal of their attention than the answers of the Austrian writer and philosopher “Ludwig Wittgenstein” were brilliant in their logic or His transgression towards the passion for the most important puzzle and the belief that its role is not limited to creating a space for coexistence, and a bridge through which ideas cross, but rather goes beyond them to being a basis on which science is built and a universe from which knowledge emerges.
In order to reach an exciting discovery and a valuable effect that requires its traceability, Ludwig made a generous effort to explore the depths of the language and clarify its ambiguity. Europe, Michel de Montaigne, in the second book of his collection, Essays, said, “The inability of philosophers to formulate their ideas in any verbal form was because they needed a new language,” but he was not met among the philosophers of the French Renaissance who would pay attention to him.
It was Wittgenstein's certainty in the effectiveness of language that prompted him to realize that consciousness is nothing but a symbolic linguistic activity associated with concrete assets that make up the world, and through a very abstract theory that included his famous author, Tractatus Logico Philosophicus, linking the elements of language and the components of the world through his analysis of the two structures of the world And the language concluded that they have a similar and opposite logic in which the names represent images of things, while the sentences are consistent with the perception of facts, which means that the language is a mirror that paints things in the form of linguistic symbols, and the components of the world are the explicit representation of the elements of the language and any use of language outside this framework is arbitrary and unjust. Legitimate and meaningless, and whatever linguistic issue describes what does not exist in reality, it is absurd and worthless.
At that time, it was an amazing philosophical and theoretical leap to the extent that it seemed unfair to describe it as interesting. It began as a small ray of sunshine that expanded until it lit up many dark areas and gave everyone a more comprehensive and clear vision.
No one, like Wittgenstein, promoted the idea that language is the center of the circle around which life, science, and philosophy revolve. As the hidden link between the world and language with a link of similarity and congruence, he not only ignited a philosophical revolution, but also enacted a law that remained in place until he demolished it himself, and opened a window from which logical positivist philosophers looked out. On a wide horizon that was surrounded by many theories, which were later returned as works revolving around the ideas launched by Wittgenstein. The logical atomism philosophy of the British Bertrand Russell came as one of the most prominent examples that were seen as an idea that remained on its way to another head.
The theory of the image in meaning was not the result of a wide imagination or a mere coincidence, but was the result of careful and dexterous contemplation, serious and persistent work, and an urgent desire to be understood in any way the language and the world proceed, and therefore it came solid and incapable of argument.
It began as a sperm containing a mixture of ideas and remained attached to Wittgenstein's imagination until its formulation. Then it took years to wrap itself in the darkness of his bag, which he fought in the midst of World War II. It spread on his shoulders and moved with him from one trench to another, accompanying him for the years of his captivity before he and him were released to obtain the uniqueness of the theory that was born under the whistle of bullets. And breathed the smell of detention centers and gave the feasibility of philosophy an exciting flame.
However, to the extent of her brilliance, she did not answer the question of whether the language could summon to the imagination of the reader an accurate picture of the meaning contained in a fictional or poetic text and completely identical to that which came out of the writer's imagination or memory?
Wittgenstein's biography assumes that such a question came to his mind, and brought him back to the field of philosophy after he had been for an insignificant time believing that he had won an ideal solution to the problems of philosophy. He sent it to Franz Zafer Kapus, and it is the phrase that Ludwig is not thought to have read, but it describes what I am certain he had in mind before he formed what can be described as the later Wittgenstein who went to argue his first theory and drop it with another that does not see that the language has a single logic, but rather describes it as a strange blink It considers that language is a group of practices that do not coincide, but are similar in some of their features in a complex way, and that each of them has its own logic that reserves the right to enact its own laws that do not take it out of the framework of “family similarities”, the term that Ludwig decided to call the essence of his theory It is included in the author, which was published after his departure and was marked by Philosophical Investigations.
The space of language in our minds expands to what is greater than material assets and greater than mental entities, and therefore what comes to the mind of the reader when he contemplates the difference between the impact of rhyming and coherent words whose brilliance appears exciting and disciplined is not the same as what he feels about those that come as smoky masses that penetrate the soul and mix with it. Until it settles in its passion and puts its mark in the formation of its emotion and participates in the manufacture of its emotions, however, a state of indifference to the emotion of language afflicts philosophers, preventing them from seeing it as people with reading do, but Wittgenstein's uniqueness lies in his ability to deal with language as an object that dictates his own feeling and builds his thoughts on the creator patiently and keeps him leaning on his certainty, for language not only describes what we think about, but also arranges the crowded thoughts in our heads and through a hidden mechanism beneath its surface luster, it connects to our souls and attracts its disturbances to the outside of us.
Mohammed Mohsen
